Clontz v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Clontz v. State

115 So. 385, 22 Ala. App. 321, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 27

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 7, 1928

Docket7 Div. 462.

StatusPublished

This text of 115 So. 385 (Clontz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clontz v. State, 115 So. 385, 22 Ala. App. 321, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 27 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMPORD, J.

We have read this entire record, ana, while there are- two technical errors in the rulings of the court, in that the state was permitted to prove that "the name of defendant had been included in a list of 'probable violators of the prohibition law handed witness by the sheriff 'of the county, and whom witness, as a law enforcement officer, was instructed to investigate, such errors are not sufficient to constitute reversible error. After a careful consideration of the whole record, we are convinced that the defendant had a fair trial. Let the judgment be affirmed. .

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMPORD, J.

We have read this entire record, ana, while there are- two technical errors in the rulings of the court, in that the state was permitted to prove that "the name of defendant had been included in a list of 'probable violators of the prohibition law handed witness by the sheriff 'of the county, and whom witness, as a law enforcement officer, was instructed to investigate, such errors are not sufficient to constitute reversible error. After a careful consideration of the whole record, we are convinced that the defendant had a fair trial. Let the judgment be affirmed. .

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 So. 385, 22 Ala. App. 321, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clontz-v-state-alactapp-1928.