Clontz v. Purser
56 S.E.2d 390, 231 N.C. 162, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 488
This text of 56 S.E.2d 390 (Clontz v. Purser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clontz v. Purser, 56 S.E.2d 390, 231 N.C. 162, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 488 (N.C. 1949).
Opinion
We concur in the conclusion of the court below that the testimony offered fails to show actionable negligence on the part of the defendant such as would require submission of issues to a jury. Therefore, the judgment entered is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
56 S.E.2d 390, 231 N.C. 162, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clontz-v-purser-nc-1949.