Cloke v. Hotel Roosevelt Corp.

16 A.D.2d 771, 227 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9538
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 22, 1962·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Determination of the Appellate Term affirming a judgment of the City Court in favor of plaintiff unanimously reversed on the law and the facts and complaint dismissed, with costs to the appellant. The evidence fails to show any defect or dangerous condition in regard to the stairway on which plaintiff fell. Plaintiff relies on a combination of lighting and identical floor covering which allegedly obscured a step and induced the illusion of a level, unbroken surface. The area was adequately lighted, and plaintiff was familiar with the premises and well aware of the existence and location of the stairs. Settle order on notice. Concur — Rabin, J. P., McNally, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cloke v. Hotel Roosevelt Corp., 16 A.D.2d 771, 227 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9538 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

16 A.D.2d 771 (Cloke v. Hotel Roosevelt Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saretsky v. 85 Kenmare Realty Corp.
85 A.D.3d 89 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)