Clodfelter v. North Carolina Gas Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Clodfelter v. North Carolina Gas Corp.

56 S.E.2d 600, 231 N.C. 343, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 517

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedDecember 14, 1949

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 56 S.E.2d 600 (Clodfelter v. North Carolina Gas Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clodfelter v. North Carolina Gas Corp., 56 S.E.2d 600, 231 N.C. 343, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 517 (N.C. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Apparently, both appellants are relying on the same assignment of error as only one appears on the record. It points out no particular ruling to which the parties object. Hence, the only question presented is whether error appears on the face of the record. We find none. Terry v. Ice & Coal Co., ante, 103; Parker v. Duke University, 230 N. C., 656, 55 S.E. 2d 189.

The judgment will be affirmed on both appeals.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Apparently, both appellants are relying on the same assignment of error as only one appears on the record. It points out no particular ruling to which the parties object. Hence, the only question presented is whether error appears on the face of the record. We find none. Terry v. Ice & Coal Co., ante, 103; Parker v. Duke University, 230 N. C., 656, 55 S.E. 2d 189.

The judgment will be affirmed on both appeals.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 S.E.2d 600, 231 N.C. 343, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clodfelter-v-north-carolina-gas-corp-nc-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack