Clodfelter v. North Carolina Gas Corp.
56 S.E.2d 600, 231 N.C. 343, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 517
Opinion
Apparently, both appellants are relying on the same assignment of error as only one appears on the record. It points out no particular ruling to which the parties object. Hence, the only question presented is whether error appears on the face of the record. We find none. Terry v. Ice & Coal Co., ante, 103; Parker v. Duke University, 230 N. C., 656, 55 S.E. 2d 189.
The judgment will be affirmed on both appeals.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clodfelter v. North Carolina Gas Corp., 56 S.E.2d 600, 231 N.C. 343, 1949 N.C. LEXIS 517 (N.C. 1949).
56 S.E.2d 600 (Clodfelter v. North Carolina Gas Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Worsley v. S. &. W. Rendering Co.
80 S.E.2d 467 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
Scarboro v. Morgan
58 S.E.2d 354 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)