Clockwork Development Venture v. Catamount Construction Corp.
This text of 95 A.D.2d 672 (Clockwork Development Venture v. Catamount Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Motion for stay denied. Petitioner’s participation in the arbitration, however, shall not be deemed to have waived the claim that a condition precedent to arbitration has not been complied with. Appellant is directed to perfect the appeal for the October, 1983 Term. In the event the appeal is not so perfected, [673]*673the stipulation of the parties shall be of no further force or effect. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Asch, Kassal and Alexander, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 A.D.2d 672, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clockwork-development-venture-v-catamount-construction-corp-nyappdiv-1983.