Clock Decloux v. M M Poultry, No. 105184 (Feb. 7, 1995)
This text of 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1214-YY (Clock Decloux v. M M Poultry, No. 105184 (Feb. 7, 1995)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The factual and procedural background of this case is as follows.
The plaintiff, Clock DeCloux, a Connecticut partnership, instituted this action against the defendants, MM Poultry, John Lombardi, Jr. and Jerry Kil, for money damages essentially claiming a breach of lease. The two count I complaint, dated March 8, 1994, claims a breach of lease for failure to pay rent against defendant tenant MM Poultry in count one, and breach of contract against defendants Lombardi and Kil, guarantors of the lease, in count two for refusing to honor their guarantees.
"In deciding a motion for summary judgment, the trial court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party . . . the test is whether a party would be entitled to a directed verdict on the same facts." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Connell v. Colwell,
"If an issue of fact does exist, the trial court cannot try that issue. . . . The nonmovant has a constitutional right to have a jury decide any issue of fact." (Citations omitted.)Ferreira v. Pisaturo,
It is evident from the pleadings and documentary materials in the record that genuine issues of material fact exist with respect to whether the lease was modified and whether there was an accord and satisfaction. Therefore, the CT Page 1216 plaintiff who is the movant for summary judgment, failed to meet its burden to show the absence of any genuine issue of material fact. Consequently, the court denies the plaintiff Motion for Summary Judgment.
Teller, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1214-YY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clock-decloux-v-m-m-poultry-no-105184-feb-7-1995-connsuperct-1995.