Clive Richards v. Atlanta Qoz Fund LLC
This text of Clive Richards v. Atlanta Qoz Fund LLC (Clive Richards v. Atlanta Qoz Fund LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ February 03, 2022
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A22E0028. CLIVE RICHARDS v. ATLANTA QOZ FUND LLC.
Petitioner filed this emergency motion asking this Court to review an order and judgment issued by the State Court of Fulton County on February 2, 2022, and asking this Court for a “Motion [for] Relief [f]rom Judgment” as well as a “Motion [t]o Stay Writ of Possession.” For the following reasons, we deny the motion. This Court’s Rule 40 (b) emergency powers are limited and intended to be used sparingly. Rule 40 (b) provides, in relevant part, that we may only issue “such orders or give such direction to the trial court as may be necessary to preserve jurisdiction of an appeal or to prevent the contested issue from becoming moot.” In this case, the petitioner has an existing appellate remedy. “[A]ppeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of lower courts by certiorari or de novo proceedings shall be by application for discretionary appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), (b).” (Citation omitted.) Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003). See also Dean’s Catering v. Sturm & Assoc., 231 Ga. App. 202, 202-203 (498 SE2d 786) (1998) (an appeal from a decision of the superior court reviewing de novo a decision of the magistrate court and, thereafter, granting summary judgment and a writ of possession is subject to the discretionary appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1)). Further, the proper and timely filing of an application for discretionary appeal acts as a supersedeas. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (h) (“[t]he filing of an application for appeal shall act as a supersedeas to the extent that a notice of appeal acts as supersedeas”). Because the petitioner has appellate remedies available to him, it is unnecessary to invoke this Court’s emergency powers. Therefore, the motion is hereby DENIED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 02/03/2022 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Clive Richards v. Atlanta Qoz Fund LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clive-richards-v-atlanta-qoz-fund-llc-gactapp-2022.