Clippenger v. Hastings

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Clippenger v. Hastings

21 Kan. 679

DecidedJanuary 15, 1879

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Kan. 679 (Clippenger v. Hastings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clippenger v. Hastings, 21 Kan. 679 (Ark. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Prior decisions of this court dispose of every substantial question in this case, as follows: Turner v. Hale, 8 Kas. 38, on the question whether the findings are supported by the evidence; Marshall v. Shibley, 11 Kas. 114, on the admissibility of the record of the deed; Scoffins v. Grandstaff, 12 Kas. 467 and 471, on the character of the deed and covenants.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Prior decisions of this court dispose of every substantial question in this case, as follows: Turner v. Hale, 8 Kas. 38, on the question whether the findings are supported by the evidence; Marshall v. Shibley, 11 Kas. 114, on the admissibility of the record of the deed; Scoffins v. Grandstaff, 12 Kas. 467 and 471, on the character of the deed and covenants.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Kan. 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clippenger-v-hastings-ark-1879.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack