Clippenger v. Hastings

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Clippenger v. Hastings

21 Kan. 679

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 15, 1879·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Prior decisions of this court dispose of every substantial question in this case, as follows: Turner v. Hale, 8 Kas. 38, on the question whether the findings are supported by the evidence; Marshall v. Shibley, 11 Kas. 114, on the admissibility of the record of the deed; Scoffins v. Grandstaff, 12 Kas. 467 and 471, on the character of the deed and covenants.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Prior decisions of this court dispose of every substantial question in this case, as follows: Turner v. Hale, 8 Kas. 38, on the question whether the findings are supported by the evidence; Marshall v. Shibley, 11 Kas. 114, on the admissibility of the record of the deed; Scoffins v. Grandstaff, 12 Kas. 467 and 471, on the character of the deed and covenants.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Clippenger v. Hastings, 21 Kan. 679 (Ark. 1879).

Pincite

21 Kan. 679 (Clippenger v. Hastings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related