Clinton v. State
This text of 492 So. 2d 424 (Clinton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a guideline sentence. The circuit court judge improperly departed and increased appellant’s sentence from the recommended guideline sentence. We vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. Riddle v. State, 488 So.2d 903 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Davis v. State, 487 So.2d 1104 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); Boldes v. State, 475 So.2d 1356 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Burch v. State, 462 So.2d 548 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
492 So. 2d 424, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1572, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clinton-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.