Clinton v. Munson Steamship Line

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Clinton v. Munson Steamship Line

129 A.D. 895, 113 N.Y.S. 1129

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clinton v. Munson Steamship Line. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 A.D. 59 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1908·Published

Opinion

Judgment and orders reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, for error of the court in refusing to charge the defendant’s request that if defendant furnished a proper and sufficient cover for the hole and it was taken and left off the hole by the neglect of the coemployees of the plaintiff, the defendant was entitled to a verdict. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and orders reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, for error of the court in refusing to charge the defendant’s request that if defendant furnished a proper and sufficient cover for the hole and it was taken and left off the hole by the neglect of the coemployees of the plaintiff, the defendant was entitled to a verdict. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Clinton v. Munson Steamship Line, 129 A.D. 895, 113 N.Y.S. 1129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

129 A.D. 895 (Clinton v. Munson Steamship Line) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.