Clinton v. Mitchell
3 Johns. 144
This text of 3 Johns. 144 (Clinton v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clinton v. Mitchell, 3 Johns. 144 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).
Opinion
We are not disposed to countenance this mode of pleading, unless it be done in good faith. If done wantonly, and for the purpose of experiment, it ought not to be suffered. Unless the defendant will state upon the record, or make affidavit, that the charges contained in the notice are groundless, the motion must be denied.
Rule refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Johns. 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clinton-v-mitchell-nysupct-1808.