Clinton v. King

3 How. Pr. 55
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 28, 1847
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 3 How. Pr. 55 (Clinton v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clinton v. King, 3 How. Pr. 55 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).

Opinion

Harris, Justice.

The sheriff having proceeded so far in the execution of the writ of replevin, as to take the property and deliver it to the Plaintiffs, the Defendant was not bound to wait until he should be served with a summons before he should appear in the suit. He had a right at once to give notice of his appearance, in order that he might, if entitled thereto, procure a return of the property. It is no answer to the default of the Plaintiffs for not having their sureties justify or giving a new bond within the time allowed for that purpose, after notice of exception, that the sheriff had omitted to serve the Defendant with a summons at the commencement of the suit. The Defendant himself, after having appeared in the cause, would have no right to take the objection.

The motion is granted, unless within twenty days the Plaintiffs cause their sureties to justify or file a new bond, as provided by law in such cases, and pay the costs of this motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duer v. Fox
27 Misc. 676 (New York Supreme Court, 1899)
Havemeyer v. Brooklyn Sugar Refining Co.
26 Abb. N. Cas. 157 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 How. Pr. 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clinton-v-king-nysupct-1847.