Clinton v. International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots

213 Cal. App. 2d 36, 28 Cal. Rptr. 488, 1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 2691
California Court of Appeal·Decided February 14, 1963·No. Civ. No. 26330·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

BURKE, P. J.

This is an appeal from the order made November 1, 1961, “Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsidering the Court’s Order of Dismissal of the Petition and Complaint.” The order dismissing the action was made October 20, 1961, in response to a motion of defendants International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots, West Coast Local No. 90 and Robert E. Durkin. The ground of the motion for reconsideration was judicial error—the dismissal had eliminated indispensable parties—; no fact not available upon the hearing of the motion to dismiss was presented. The order denying the motion to reconsider, under such circumstances, is not an appealable order. (Hunt v. United Artists Studio Inc., 79 Cal.App.2d 619, 626 [180 P.2d 460].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Jefferson, J., and Bishop, J. pro tem.,

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clinton v. International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots, 213 Cal. App. 2d 36, 28 Cal. Rptr. 488, 1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 2691 (Cal. Ct. App. 1963).

213 Cal. App. 2d 36 (Clinton v. International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Worth v. Asiatic Transpacific, Inc.
93 Cal. App. 3d 849 (California Court of Appeal, 1979)
Lavrischeff v. Blumer
77 Cal. App. 3d 406 (California Court of Appeal, 1978)
Clinton v. Joshua Hendy Corp.
244 Cal. App. 2d 183 (California Court of Appeal, 1966)