Clinton v. Garner

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Clinton v. Garner

75 S.E. 675, 11 Ga. App. 449, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 436

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 17, 1912

Docket3614; 3615

StatusPublished

This text of 75 S.E. 675 (Clinton v. Garner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clinton v. Garner, 75 S.E. 675, 11 Ga. App. 449, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 436 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, J.

The judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to dismiss the certiorari, on any of the grounds of the motion to dismiss; and, in conformity with the repeated rulings of this court, and of the Supreme Court, the first grant of a new trial on certiorari will not be disturbed, where, as in the present case, the verdict in the justice’s court was not demanded.

Judgment affirmed.

Pottle, J., not presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

The judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to dismiss the certiorari, on any of the grounds of the motion to dismiss; and, in conformity with the repeated rulings of this court, and of the Supreme Court, the first grant of a new trial on certiorari will not be disturbed, where, as in the present case, the verdict in the justice’s court was not demanded.

Judgment affirmed.

Pottle, J., not presiding.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 S.E. 675, 11 Ga. App. 449, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clinton-v-garner-gactapp-1912.