Clinton v. Croswell
2 Cai. Cas. 245, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 398
This text of 2 Cai. Cas. 245 (Clinton v. Croswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clinton v. Croswell, 2 Cai. Cas. 245, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 398 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).
Opinion
There is no ground for the application. The defendant can take nothing by his motion, and must pay costs to the plaintiff.
Motion denied.
Change of venue in an action for libel dispersed in different counties will bo denied, unless there is a decided preponderance of witnesses, &c. Root v. King, 4 Cow. 403; see Nicholson v. Northrop, 3 J. R. 189.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Cai. Cas. 245, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clinton-v-croswell-nysupct-1804.