Clinton Trust Co. v. 142-144 Joralemon Street Corp.

145 Misc. 475, 259 N.Y.S. 563, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1272
New York Supreme Court·Decided September 13, 1932·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Cuff, J.

Action is to foreclose a mortgage on realty. Defendant is the owner of the mortgaged premises — an apartment house. Defendant claims that the coal was not part of the security given for the loan. The mortgage contains this clause: Together with all appurtenant fixtures and articles of personal property belonging to the owner of said premises now or hereafter attached to or used in connection with said premises.”

An owner may mortgage what he has at the time the mortgage is executed as well as anything to which he might subsequently obtain complete title. (Prisco & Soverio v. Bifulco Bros., 234 App. Div. 122.) Defendant mortgaged this coal by the clause above quoted from the mortgage. It was delivered, put in the bin in the cellar, and appropriated to the use of the premises. Certainly coal is used in connection with ” an apartment house. In fact, it is a necessary element to maintain one.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clinton Trust Co. v. 142-144 Joralemon Street Corp., 145 Misc. 475, 259 N.Y.S. 563, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1272 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1932).

145 Misc. 475 (Clinton Trust Co. v. 142-144 Joralemon Street Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Benson
155 Misc. 738 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1935)
Bank of Manhattan Trust Co. v. Ellda Corp.
147 Misc. 374 (New York Supreme Court, 1933)