Clinton & O. W. Ry. Co. v. White Lumber & Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Clinton & O. W. Ry. Co. v. White Lumber & Coal Co.

1913 OK 501, 134 P. 396, 39 Okla. 140, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 471

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 6, 1913

Docket2859

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK 501 (Clinton & O. W. Ry. Co. v. White Lumber & Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clinton & O. W. Ry. Co. v. White Lumber & Coal Co., 1913 OK 501, 134 P. 396, 39 Okla. 140, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 471 (Okla. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

The petition in error and case-made in this case was filed in this court on July 19, 1911. Plaintiff in error has filed no brief and made no effort to comply with the rules of this court. Upon the authority of Douglas v. Clayton Townsite Co., 29 Okla. 9, 115 Pac. 1016, and other cases cited in the opinion of the court, the appeal should be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

The petition in error and case-made in this case was filed in this court on July 19, 1911. Plaintiff in error has filed no brief and made no effort to comply with the rules of this court. Upon the authority of Douglas v. Clayton Townsite Co., 29 Okla. 9, 115 Pac. 1016, and other cases cited in the opinion of the court, the appeal should be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK 501, 134 P. 396, 39 Okla. 140, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clinton-o-w-ry-co-v-white-lumber-coal-co-okla-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack