Clinton Howard v. Earl Dupont and Johnny Bonton

602 F.2d 1191, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 11730
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 19, 1979·No. 78-1876·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Clinton Howard, an inmate of the Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola, filed a pro se complaint in the district court alleging that despite Howard’s request for protection, appellees failed to protect him from another inmate, and that as a result Howard was attacked by the other inmate with a razor blade and severely injured, in violation of 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (1970). His complaint was dismissed pursuant to a procedure this Court reviewed and found deficient in Mitchell v. Beaubouef, 581 F.2d 412 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied-U.S.-, 99 S.Ct. 2416, 60 L.Ed.2d 1072 (1979). See, e. g. Hurst v. Phelps, 579 F.2d 940 (5th Cir. 1978).

We, therefore, vacate the dismissal of Howard’s complaint and remand for reconsideration by the district court in light of the procedural dictates set forth in Mitchell v. Beaubouef.

VACATED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clinton Howard v. Earl Dupont and Johnny Bonton, 602 F.2d 1191, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 11730 (5th Cir. 1979).

602 F.2d 1191 (Clinton Howard v. Earl Dupont and Johnny Bonton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related