Clinton Hill Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Strieby
52 N.J. Eq. 576
Opinion
Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Mague, Reed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Green, Krueger, Sims, Smith — 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clinton Hill Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Strieby, 52 N.J. Eq. 576 (N.J. 1894).
52 N.J. Eq. 576 (Clinton Hill Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Strieby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Talcott, Inc. v. ROTO AMERICAN CORP.
302 A.2d 147 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1973)
Antonucci v. Gravina
34 A.2d 78 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)