Clinton Hill Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Strieby
52 N.J. Eq. 576
This text of 52 N.J. Eq. 576 (Clinton Hill Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Strieby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clinton Hill Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Strieby, 52 N.J. Eq. 576 (N.J. 1894).
Opinion
Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Lippincott, Mague, Reed, Van Syckel, Bogert, Brown, Green, Krueger, Sims, Smith — 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Talcott, Inc. v. ROTO AMERICAN CORP.
302 A.2d 147 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1973)
Antonucci v. Gravina
34 A.2d 78 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
52 N.J. Eq. 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clinton-hill-lumber-manufacturing-co-v-strieby-nj-1894.