Clinton H. Smith Co. v. Oathout
67 A. 1023, 75 N.J.L. 438, 46 Vroom 438, 1907 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 49
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This is an appeal from the Second District Court of the city of Newark. The briefs deal with the case as if it were taken pursuant to Pamph. L. 1902, p. 565. Under that act the appellant must bring up, with the state of the case, a certified transcript of the judgment record in the court below. Katzin v. Jenny, 45 Vroom 131.
In the present ease there is no such transcript of the judgment record, and therefore the appeal must be dismissed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clinton H. Smith Co. v. Oathout, 67 A. 1023, 75 N.J.L. 438, 46 Vroom 438, 1907 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 49 (N.J. 1907).
67 A. 1023 (Clinton H. Smith Co. v. Oathout) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Zyk v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
180 A. 628 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1935)