Clinton H. Smith Co. v. Oathout

67 A. 1023, 75 N.J.L. 438, 46 Vroom 438, 1907 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 49
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 11, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 67 A. 1023 (Clinton H. Smith Co. v. Oathout) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clinton H. Smith Co. v. Oathout, 67 A. 1023, 75 N.J.L. 438, 46 Vroom 438, 1907 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 49 (N.J. 1907).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Trenoiiakd, J.

This is an appeal from the Second District Court of the city of Newark. The briefs deal with the case as if it were taken pursuant to Pamph. L. 1902, p. 565. Under that act the appellant must bring up, with the state of the case, a certified transcript of the judgment record in the court below. Katzin v. Jenny, 45 Vroom 131.

In the present ease there is no such transcript of the judgment record, and therefore the appeal must be dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zyk v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
180 A. 628 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 A. 1023, 75 N.J.L. 438, 46 Vroom 438, 1907 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clinton-h-smith-co-v-oathout-nj-1907.