Clinton Eugene Whitfield v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 15, 2014·No. 05-14-00526-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered December 12, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00526-CR

CLINTON EUGENE WHITFIELD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-55984-J

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal. On December 5, 2014, we denied appellant’s second motion to extend time to file his brief and ordered the trial court to make findings. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the appeal; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by court-appointed counsel Niles Illich; (3) counsel’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is his workload; and (4) counsel informed the trial court appellant’s brief would be filed by December 23, 2014.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief by DECEMBER 23, 2014. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clinton Eugene Whitfield v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Clinton Eugene Whitfield v. State (Clinton Eugene Whitfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.