Clinton County v. Martin

65 Ohio St. (N.S.) 287
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 19, 1901
StatusPublished

This text of 65 Ohio St. (N.S.) 287 (Clinton County v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clinton County v. Martin, 65 Ohio St. (N.S.) 287 (Ohio 1901).

Opinion

By the Court :

The appointment of an official stenographer and assistant by the court of common pleas in counties of the class to which Clinton belongs, is authorized by sections 475 of the Revised Statutes. It is the duty of the stenographer, under section 479, to make transcripts into long hand of the shorthand notes taken in a cause, when requested by a party or his attorney. And the fees of the stenographer for making such transcripts in criminal cases are required, by section 480, to be paid out of the county treasury. When the fees -are paid by the defendant he is entitled to be reimbursed out of the county treasury. A proper way to obtain such reimbursement is to present the claim ' to the county commissioners for allowance, as provided by section 894; and, upon their refusal to allow the claim, to appeal to the court of common pleas, in accordance with section 896, as was done in this case.

Judgment affirmed.

Minshall, C. J., Williams, Burket, Spear, Davis and Shauck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 Ohio St. (N.S.) 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clinton-county-v-martin-ohio-1901.