Clinton Charles Taliaferro v. United States

457 F.2d 504, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10011
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 19, 1972·No. 71-2756·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Clinton Taliaferro appeals a district court order denying relief sought by him under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 upon the ground that his plea of guilty to a charge of possession of counterfeit currency (18 U.S.C. § 472) had not been voluntarily made *505 as required by Fed.R.Crim.P. 11. The district court opinion is reported as Taliaferro v. United States, 330 F.Supp. 408 (N.D.Cal.1971). We are quite convinced that the district court’s findings and order are not clearly erroneous, Conley v. United States, 407 F.2d 45 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 396 U.S. 853, 90 S.Ct. 113, 24 L.Ed.2d 102 (1969), and affirm for the reasons set out in that opinion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clinton Charles Taliaferro v. United States, 457 F.2d 504, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10011 (9th Cir. 1972).

457 F.2d 504 (Clinton Charles Taliaferro v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eathorne v. State
448 So. 2d 445 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)