Clinton Albert Alton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Clinton Albert Alton v. State

215 S.W.2d 893, 152 Tex. Crim. 533, 1948 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1392

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 22, 1948

DocketNo. 24181.

StatusPublished

This text of 215 S.W.2d 893 (Clinton Albert Alton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clinton Albert Alton v. State, 215 S.W.2d 893, 152 Tex. Crim. 533, 1948 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1392 (Tex. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is burglary. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of three years.

. In this case, as in Cause No. 24,180 (Page 531 of this volume) pending in this court, appellant made a voluntary confession and informed the officers where the property taken from the burglarized premises was located; that as a result of such in *534 formation, the officers recovered the same and delivered it to the owner. The record reflects that the same procedure was pursued in this case as in the case herein referred to and with the same result.

For the reasons stated in our original opinion in the case of Clinton Albert Alton v. State, in Cause 24,180, the judgment of the trial court entered in this case is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is burglary. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of three years.

. In this case, as in Cause No. 24,180 (Page 531 of this volume) pending in this court, appellant made a voluntary confession and informed the officers where the property taken from the burglarized premises was located; that as a result of such in *534 formation, the officers recovered the same and delivered it to the owner. The record reflects that the same procedure was pursued in this case as in the case herein referred to and with the same result.

For the reasons stated in our original opinion in the case of Clinton Albert Alton v. State, in Cause 24,180, the judgment of the trial court entered in this case is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 S.W.2d 893, 152 Tex. Crim. 533, 1948 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clinton-albert-alton-v-state-texcrimapp-1948.