Clint v. Houston Ice Brewing Company
This text of 169 S.W. 411 (Clint v. Houston Ice Brewing Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This application for writ of error is refused because it does not appear from the facts stated that the Ice & Gin Company of Harlingen was a public corporation;' therefore it was not permissible for the court to postpone the prior lien of the Houston lee & Brewing Company to the expenses and costs of the receivership sued out in this case. We have thought it prudent to make this statement lest our refusal of the writ of error might be understood to overrule Ellis v. Water Co., 86 Tex. 109, 23 S. W. 858, in which this court held that the prior mortgage or lien could be postponed in favor of the expenses of operating a water company upon the ground that a water company was a public corporation, because it was necessary to operate the plant for the convenience of the population of a town;
There is no conflict in the decision which we make in this case and the case above cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 S.W. 411, 106 Tex. 508, 1914 Tex. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clint-v-houston-ice-brewing-company-tex-1914.