Clint v. Houston Ice & Brewing Co.

106 Tex. 508
Texas Supreme Court·Decided December 22, 1914·No. Application No. 8434·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice BROWN

delivered the opinion of the court.

This application for writ of error is refused because it does not appear from the facts stated that the Ice & Gin Company of Harlingen was a public corporation, therefore it was not permissible for the court to [509] postpone the prior lien of the Houston Ice & Brewing Company to the expenses and costs of the receivership sued out in this case.

We have thought it prudent to make this statement lest our refusal of the writ of error might be understood to overrule Ellis v. Vernon Ice, Lt. & Water Co., 86 Texas, 109, in which this court held that the prior mortgage or lien could be postponed in favor of the expenses of operating a water company upon the ground that a water company was a public corporation because it was necessary to operate the plant for the convenience of the population of a town. There is no conflict in the decision which we make in this case and the case above cited.

Writ of error refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clint v. Houston Ice & Brewing Co., 106 Tex. 508 (Tex. 1914).

106 Tex. 508 (Clint v. Houston Ice & Brewing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1943
Scarborough v. Connell
84 S.W.2d 734 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Van Valkenburgh v. Ford
207 S.W. 405 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Craver v. Greer
179 S.W. 862 (Texas Supreme Court, 1915)