Clint Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Clint Johnson v. State

DecidedMarch 17, 2010

Docket12-10-00063-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Clint Johnson v. State (Clint Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clint Johnson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

NO. 12-10-00063-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS CLINT JOHNSON, APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 114TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, ' SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery. We have received the trial court's certification showing that this is a plea bargain case and Appellant has no right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The certification is signed by Appellant and his trial counsel. Additionally, Appellant’s appellate counsel has notified us that based on the controlling law, he is of the opinion that this court does not have jurisdiction of the appeal and therefore the appeal must be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. SAM GRIFFITH Justice

Opinion delivered March 17, 2010. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NO. 12-10-00063-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS CLINT JOHNSON, APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 114TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, ' SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery. We have received the trial court's certification showing that this is a plea bargain case and Appellant has no right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The certification is signed by Appellant and his trial counsel. Additionally, Appellant’s appellate counsel has notified us that based on the controlling law, he is of the opinion that this court does not have jurisdiction of the appeal and therefore the appeal must be dismissed. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. SAM GRIFFITH Justice

Opinion delivered March 17, 2010. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Clint Johnson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clint-johnson-v-state-texapp-2010.