Clint Devone Seaton v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: March 30, 2006
• Docket: 01-06-00130-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01-06-00130-CR

CLINT DEVONE SEATON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

---

On Appeal from the 177th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1042467

---

MEMORANDUM OPINIONAppellant pleaded guilty to the offense of robbery and, in accordance with his plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for five years. Appellant filed a timely pro se notice of appeal.

               In a plea-bargained case in which the punishment assessed does not exceed the plea agreement, a defendant may appeal only those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or after obtaining the trial court’s permission to appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2); Griffin v. State, 145 S.W.3d 645, 648-49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004); Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 80 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).

               The trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal in this case states that this is a plea-bargained case and appellant has no right to appeal. The record supports the correctness of the certification. Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614-15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We must dismiss an appeal if the trial court’s certification shows there is no right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

               We note that appellant also waived his right to appeal. See Buck v. State, 45 S.W.3d 275, 278 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, no pet.).

               Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Jennings and Alcala.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).