Clinkscales v. Clinkscales

97 So. 922, 210 Ala. 358, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 3
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedOctober 18, 1923
Docket6 Div. 921.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 97 So. 922 (Clinkscales v. Clinkscales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clinkscales v. Clinkscales, 97 So. 922, 210 Ala. 358, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 3 (Ala. 1923).

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

The courts of chancery have jurisdiction over the custody of children, independent of the statute. It is immaterial how the jurisdiction is invoked; the paramount question is the well being of the infant. Coleman v. Coleman, 198 Ala. 225, 226, 73 South. 473.

In divorce cases, the statute provides for awarding the custody and education of the children of the marriage as may seem right and proper, having regard to the moral character and prudence of the parents, the age and sex of the child. Code, § 3808.

We have carefully considered the evidence, and are of the opinion that the court committed no error in its decree as to awarding the custody of the child. No good purpose will be served by the detailed discussion of the evidence.

The decree of the circuit court, in equity, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. X, and SOMERVILLE and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murphy v. Bronstein
434 So. 2d 778 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1982)
Hattrick v. Hattrick
295 So. 2d 260 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 So. 922, 210 Ala. 358, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clinkscales-v-clinkscales-ala-1923.