Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Clines v. State

Clines v. State

975 So. 2d 575, 2008 WL 441941
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 2008
Docket1D08-0391
StatusPublished

This text of 975 So. 2d 575 (Clines v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clines v. State, 975 So. 2d 575, 2008 WL 441941 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

975 So.2d 575 (2008)

Michael Ray CLINES, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D08-0391.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 20, 2008.

Michael Ray Clines, pro se, Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

ALLEN, KAHN, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Quille v. State
975 So. 2d 575 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
975 So. 2d 575, 2008 WL 441941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clines-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.