Cline v. Warden of FCI-Williamsburg
This text of Cline v. Warden of FCI-Williamsburg (Cline v. Warden of FCI-Williamsburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7741
OCTAVIUS S. CLINE,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
WARDEN OF FCI-WILLIAMSBURG,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:10-cv-02273-RBH)
Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 23, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Octavius S. Cline, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Octavius S. Cline, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241
(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Cline v. Warden of
FCI-Williamsburg, No. 6:10-cv-02273-RBH (D.S.C. Oct. 20, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cline v. Warden of FCI-Williamsburg, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cline-v-warden-of-fci-williamsburg-ca4-2011.