Cline v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Cline v. State

34 Tex. 98

DecidedJuly 1, 1871

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Tex. 98 (Cline v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cline v. State, 34 Tex. 98 (Tex. 1871).

Pincite

Opinion

Walker, J.

Upon due examination of the record we are clearly of the opinion that J. G. Tracy, the officer before whom the preliminary proceedings in this case were had, was, both de jure and de facto, the recorder of the city of Houston at the time he took cogtiizance of the case.

The bail bond is in every respect a good and sufficient bond. (See Paschal’s Digest, article 2732.)

The death of George W. Frazer and the insolvency of his estate being suggested, the case is dismissed as to his estate, and the judgment affirmed as to W. G. Cline and B. H. Wilson and their securities.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker, J.

Upon due examination of the record we are clearly of the opinion that J. G. Tracy, the officer before whom the preliminary proceedings in this case were had, was, both de jure and de facto, the recorder of the city of Houston at the time he took cogtiizance of the case.

The bail bond is in every respect a good and sufficient bond. (See Paschal’s Digest, article 2732.)

The death of George W. Frazer and the insolvency of his estate being suggested, the case is dismissed as to his estate, and the judgment affirmed as to W. G. Cline and B. H. Wilson and their securities.

Ordered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Tex. 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cline-v-state-tex-1871.