Cline v. Okla. Coal. for Reprod. Justice

Supreme Court

Cline v. Okla. Coal. for Reprod. Justice

570 U.S. 930, 186 L. Ed. 2d 932, 133 S. Ct. 2887, 81 U.S.L.W. 3714, 2013 WL 867379, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4942

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 27, 2013

DocketNo. 12–1094.

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 570 U.S. 930 (Cline v. Okla. Coal. for Reprod. Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cline v. Okla. Coal. for Reprod. Justice, 570 U.S. 930, 186 L. Ed. 2d 932, 133 S. Ct. 2887, 81 U.S.L.W. 3714, 2013 WL 867379, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4942 (2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma granted. This Court, pursuant to the Revised Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, Okla. Stat., Tit. 20, § 1601 et seq. (West 2002), respectfully certifies to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma the following question: Whether H.B. No. 1970, Section 1, Chapter 216, O.S.L. 2011 prohibits: (1) the use of misoprostol to induce abortions, including the use of misoprostol in conjunction with mifepristone according to a protocol approved by the Food and Drug Administration; and (2) the use of methotrexate to treat eptopic pregnancies. Further proceedings in this case are reserved pending receipt of a response from the Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma granted. This Court, pursuant to the Revised Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, Okla. Stat., Tit. 20, § 1601 et seq. (West 2002), respectfully certifies to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma the following question: Whether H.B. No. 1970, Section 1, Chapter 216, O.S.L. 2011 prohibits: (1) the use of misoprostol to induce abortions, including the use of misoprostol in conjunction with mifepristone according to a protocol approved by the Food and Drug Administration; and (2) the use of methotrexate to treat eptopic pregnancies. Further proceedings in this case are reserved pending receipt of a response from the Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

570 U.S. 930, 186 L. Ed. 2d 932, 133 S. Ct. 2887, 81 U.S.L.W. 3714, 2013 WL 867379, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cline-v-okla-coal-for-reprod-justice-scotus-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack