Cline v. Foster

1933 OK 16, 18 P.2d 513, 161 Okla. 285, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 457
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 24, 1933·No. 22385·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

D. E. Cline, defendant below. perfected his appeal May 26, 1931, from a judgment rendered in the trial court, and on September 4, 1931, filed his brief. Defendant in error was granted his last of numerous extensions to file brief April 12, 1932, and has wholly failed to excuse his delay or failure to file brief. Under the rule of City National Blank v. Coatney, 122 Okla. 233, 253 P. 481, and numerous decisions, this court need not search the record to sustain the judgment of the trial court, but where the authorities cited reasonably tend to support the alleged errors, may reverse the case in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error. The case is therefore reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment for the plaintiff and enter a judgment for the defendant.

Note.—See under (1) 2 R. C. L. 176; R. C. L. Perm. Supp. p. 360.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cline v. Foster, 1933 OK 16, 18 P.2d 513, 161 Okla. 285, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 457 (Okla. 1933).

1933 OK 16 (Cline v. Foster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City National Bank v. Coatney
1927 OK 47 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1927)