Clinchfield Railroad Company v. J. Ralph Erwin

249 F.2d 719
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 12, 1957
Docket13082_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 F.2d 719 (Clinchfield Railroad Company v. J. Ralph Erwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clinchfield Railroad Company v. J. Ralph Erwin, 249 F.2d 719 (6th Cir. 1957).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this action brought by an employee of the appellant railroad company under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (U.S.C.A., Title 45, § 51 et seq.), judgment for $15,000 damages on the verdict of a jury was entered in the district court.

The appellant urges that the injuries received by the appellee were not in natural and probable consequence of the negligence of the carrier.

Upon consideration of the entire record in the case, we are of opinion that, applying the pertinent decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in F.E.L.A. cases, there was substantial evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury. See Webb v. Ill. Cent. R. R. Co., 352 U.S. 512, 1 L.Ed.2d 503; Lavender v. Kurn, 327 U.S. 645, 653, 66 S.Ct. 740, 90 L.Ed. 919; Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line Ry. Co., 318 U.S. 54, 63 S.Ct. 444, 87 L.Ed. 610.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steve Middleton v. United States
249 F.2d 719 (Fourth Circuit, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 F.2d 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clinchfield-railroad-company-v-j-ralph-erwin-ca6-1957.