Clinchfield Coal Co. v. Bostic

581 F. App'x 291
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 20, 2014
DocketNo. 13-2420
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 581 F. App'x 291 (Clinchfield Coal Co. v. Bostic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clinchfield Coal Co. v. Bostic, 581 F. App'x 291 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Clinchfield Coal Company petitions for review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012). Our review of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Clinchfield Coal Co. v. Bostic, No. 13-0046-BLA (BRB Sept. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
581 F. App'x 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clinchfield-coal-co-v-bostic-ca4-2014.