Clinch v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Clinch v. State

398 S.W.3d 908, 2013 WL 1966247, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 590

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 14, 2013·No. No. WD 74977·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Clinch appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, after he was convicted of first-degree murder. Clinch contends the motion court erred in denying post-conviction relief because defense counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge an allegedly unqualified juror for cause. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Clinch appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, after he was convicted of first-degree murder. Clinch contends the motion court erred in denying post-conviction relief because defense counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge an allegedly unqualified juror for cause. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Clinch v. State, 398 S.W.3d 908, 2013 WL 1966247, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 590 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

398 S.W.3d 908 (Clinch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.