Climson v. . Poole
This text of 1 N.C. 662 (Climson v. . Poole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of King's Bench primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The condition of the obligation was that the plaintiff should have free egress, ingress, and regress in the house of I. S. The defendant pleaded that he had egress, ingress, and regress, without saying free ingress, etc. It is a bad bar.
The plaintiff replied that he had shut all the outward gates. In this case the plaintiff has a right to part of the house, viz., to the chambers; therefore he ought not to be barred of his entry.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 N.C. 662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/climson-v-poole-kingsbench-1793.