Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Climpson v. State

Climpson v. State

123 So. 3d 669, 2013 WL 5658240, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16596
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 18, 2013
DocketNo. 5D13-2581
StatusPublished

This text of 123 So. 3d 669 (Climpson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Climpson v. State, 123 So. 3d 669, 2013 WL 5658240, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16596 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Shanise Climpson appeals from the trial court’s order denying her Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) motion to mitigate her sentence. Because an order denying a motion to mitigate sentence is not appealable, we lack jurisdiction. See Simms v. State, 16 So.3d 229, 229 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (holding that court lacked jurisdiction to consider appeal of order denying rule 3.800(c) motion). Accordingly, we dismiss Climpson’s appeal. See Jackson v. State, 936 So.2d 775, 775 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (dismissing appeal of order denying motion to mitigate sentence).

DISMISSED.

COHEN, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Simms v. State
16 So. 3d 229 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Jackson v. State
936 So. 2d 775 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 So. 3d 669, 2013 WL 5658240, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/climpson-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.