Climate United Fund v. Citibank, N.A.; EPA

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedApril 28, 2025
Docket25-5122
StatusPublished

This text of Climate United Fund v. Citibank, N.A.; EPA (Climate United Fund v. Citibank, N.A.; EPA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Climate United Fund v. Citibank, N.A.; EPA, (D.C. Cir. 2025).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5122 September Term, 2024 1:25-cv-00698-TSC Filed On: April 28, 2025 Climate United Fund, et al.,

Appellees

v.

Citibank, N.A.,

Appellee

Environmental Protection Agency and Lee M. Zeldin, in his official capacity as Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency,

Appellants ------------------------------ Consolidated with 25-5123

BEFORE: Pillard, Katsas, and Rao, Circuit Judges

ORDER

Upon consideration of the emergency motion for stay, the responses thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that consideration of the motion for stay be consolidated with consideration of the merits of these appeals. It is

FURTHER ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that these appeals be expedited. The following briefing schedule and format will apply:

Brief(s) of Appellants May 5, 2025 (not to exceed a total of 13,000 words, to be divided as Appellants deem fit)

Joint Appendix May 5, 2025 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 25-5122 September Term, 2024

Brief(s) of Appellees May 12, 2025 (not to exceed a total of 13,000 words, to be divided as Appellees deem fit)

Reply Brief(s) of Appellants May 15, 2025 (not to exceed a total of 6,500 words, to be divided as Appellants deem fit)

The Clerk is directed to calendar these cases for oral argument before this panel on May 19, 2025, at 9:30 a.m.

Appellants should raise all issues and arguments in the opening brief. The court ordinarily will not consider issues and arguments raised for the first time in the reply brief.

To enhance the clarity of their briefs, the parties are urged to limit the use of abbreviations, including acronyms. While acronyms may be used for entities and statutes with widely recognized initials, briefs should not contain acronyms that are not widely known. See D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 43-44 (2024); Notice Regarding Use of Acronyms (D.C. Cir. Jan. 26, 2010).

Parties are strongly encouraged to hand deliver the paper copies of their briefs to the Clerk's office on the date due. Filing by mail may delay the processing of the brief. Additionally, counsel are reminded that if filing by mail, they must use a class of mail that is at least as expeditious as first-class mail. See Fed. R. App. P. 25(a). All briefs and appendices must contain the date that the case is scheduled for oral argument at the top of the cover. See D.C. Cir. Rule 28(a)(8). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the administrative stay entered by the court on April 16, 2025, remain in effect pending further order of the court.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT: Clifton B. Cislak, Clerk

BY: /s/ Michael C. McGrail Deputy Clerk

Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Climate United Fund v. Citibank, N.A.; EPA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/climate-united-fund-v-citibank-na-epa-cadc-2025.