Clim Eugene Thomas v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00390-CR
CLIM EUGENE THOMAS APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
----------
FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
On September 6, 2012, Appellant Clim Eugene Thomas filed a post-
conviction motion for forensic DNA testing of “the victim . . . [and] the gun powder
that was use[d] as evidence.” 2 See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.01(a-1)
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 2 We do not have any information regarding Appellant’s underlying conviction. (West Supp. 2012). On December 18, 2012, the trial court denied Appellant’s
motion. See id. art. 64.03(a). On August 6, 2013, Appellant filed a notice of
appeal regarding the trial court’s denial. See id. art. 64.05 (West 2006). It is
clear that Appellant filed his notice of appeal outside of the mandated time
limitations, which divests this court of jurisdiction over his attempted appeal. See
id.; Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522–23 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1996). Therefore, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex.
R. App. P. 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: October 10, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clim Eugene Thomas v. State (Clim Eugene Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.