Clifton v. Sheldon

64 U.S. 481, 16 L. Ed. 429, 23 How. 481, 1859 U.S. LEXIS 796
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 18, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 64 U.S. 481 (Clifton v. Sheldon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clifton v. Sheldon, 64 U.S. 481, 16 L. Ed. 429, 23 How. 481, 1859 U.S. LEXIS 796 (1860).

Opinion

Mr. Justice NELSON

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of the United States for the southern district.of New York, in admiralty. A motion has been made, on the part of the. appellee, to dismiss the appeal, for the want of jurisdiction.

A libel was filed by Clifton, in the District Court, to recover freight on'the two hundred and sixty-nine bales of cotton and nine bags of wool. Brower and Sheldon appeared as claimants, and contested the claim for the freight. Brower claimed sixty-seven of the two hundred and sixty-nine bales, and Sheldon two hundred and two bales. The District Court dismissed the libel.

On appeal to the Circuit Court; this decree was reversed, and decree rendered in favor of the libellant for.the amount of the freight, $2,338.06; that J. ~W. Brower, claimant of a portion of' the cotton, pay to the libellant the sum of $583.84, being the freight on the cotton claimed by him in the suit, and that the *484 claimant, W. H. Sheldon, pay for the portion claimed by him the sum of $1,754.22. Sheldon appealed from the decree to this court.

The motion is now made to,- dismiss the appeal, on the ground.that the decree against.Sheldon is'less than $2,000, and which is apparent from a perusal of the decree. The sum decreed against him is only $1,754.22.

. .The freight was separately awarded against the claimants, in proportion to the cotton shipped by each one. The rights of each were distinct and independent. -

But if it were otherwise, and the whole of the freight jointly against the claimants, the appeal must still be dismissed, as then the claimants should have joined in it.

Motion to dismiss granted.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ellison
526 P.2d 706 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1974)
State v. DeLuna
520 P.2d 1121 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1974)
Elliot v. Lombard
66 F.2d 662 (Fifth Circuit, 1933)
Babcock v. Norton
5 F.2d 153 (Second Circuit, 1924)
Priest v. Seaman
266 F. 844 (Eighth Circuit, 1920)
The Bylands
231 F. 101 (Fifth Circuit, 1916)
Gooding v. Watkins
82 S.W. 913 (Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory, 1904)
French v. Peters
59 N.E. 449 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)
Estis v. Trabue
128 U.S. 225 (Supreme Court, 1888)
Davie v. Heyward
33 F. 93 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina, 1887)
Gibson v. Shufeldt
122 U.S. 27 (Supreme Court, 1887)
Nickerson v. Meacham
14 F. 881 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 U.S. 481, 16 L. Ed. 429, 23 How. 481, 1859 U.S. LEXIS 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clifton-v-sheldon-scotus-1860.