Clifton v. Brundage

25 Tex. 331
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 25 Tex. 331 (Clifton v. Brundage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clifton v. Brundage, 25 Tex. 331 (Tex. 1860).

Opinion

Roberts, J.

The plea of failure of consideration is clearly [333]*333liable to the exceptions taken to it for uncertainty and insufficiency. It does not properly connect the facts which seem to have been attempted to be set up, nor do they constitute good grounds for the relief sought. It fails to show what the defect of title is ; what is said in the endeavor to do so is incoherent and unintelligible. The contract of sale was executed by the delivery of a deed, and if there was any defect of title, it is not alleged that the defendant was ignorant of it. Other reasons might be given, if necessary, for holding the plea insufficient.

Judgment affirmed with damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wiseman v. Collins
242 S.W. 1091 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Tex. 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clifton-v-brundage-tex-1860.