Clifton v. Bank of Aberdeen

75 Miss. 929
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 75 Miss. 929 (Clifton v. Bank of Aberdeen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clifton v. Bank of Aberdeen, 75 Miss. 929 (Mich. 1898).

Opinion

Terral, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The Bank of Aberdeen, in the circuit court of Monroe county, recovered of W. H. Clifton, the indorser of a promissory note, a judgment for the sum agreed to be paid in said note, and also a reasonable attorney’s fee for collection. The question is whether a stipulation in a promissory note to pay a reasonable attorney’s fee affects the negotiability of such note. We regard the question as settled in this state in favor of the doctrine that such a stipulation does not affect the negotiability of the instrument. Meachum v. Pinson, 60 Miss., 217; 1 Dan. Neg. Insts., sec. 62, 62a.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cudahy Packing Co. v. State Nat. Bank
134 F. 538 (Eighth Circuit, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 Miss. 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clifton-v-bank-of-aberdeen-miss-1898.