Clifton Upholstery Co. v. Kayjun Industries, Inc.

254 So. 2d 514, 1971 La. App. LEXIS 5269
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedNovember 12, 1971
DocketNo. 3637
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 254 So. 2d 514 (Clifton Upholstery Co. v. Kayjun Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clifton Upholstery Co. v. Kayjun Industries, Inc., 254 So. 2d 514, 1971 La. App. LEXIS 5269 (La. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

MILLER, Judge.

Defendant James M. McLemore appealed the trial court’s judgment which awarded [515]*515plaintiff Clifton Upholstery Company, Inc. $10,350.35 on an open account owed by defendant Kayjun Industries, Inc. and personally guaranteed by McLemore. We affirm. Plaintiff answered the appeal contending that the appeal was frivolous. We find that the appeal was taken solely for purpose of delay and award 5% damages. LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2164.

The president of the foreign plaintiff corporation testified that he knew that the merchandise itemized on each of the sixteen invoices attached to plaintiff’s petition was ordered by and shipped to defendant. Defendants, other than having filed a one paragraph general denial for an answer, have not denied receiving the merchandise nor have they denied the correctness of the account.

Defendants failed to timely answer a request for admissions. Under LSA-C.C.P. Art. 1515 a default judgment could have been entered against defendants. After plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings, McLemore answered the request for admissions by stating that he “cannot truthfully admit or deny” that he owes the account.

Defendants offered no testimony and did not explain the failure of Mc-Lemore to testify. His failure to testify creates a presumption that his testimony would be unfavorable. City Stores Company v. Jordan, 211 So.2d 709 at 711 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1968).

The trial court’s judgment is correct.

We consider the appeal frivolous and will allow damages which we fix at five per cent. F.A.B. Distributing Company v. Marullo, 138 So.2d 656 at 658 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1962). LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2164.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. It is further ordered that plaintiff appellee recover damages for frivolous appeal in the amount of $517.52 together with legal interest thereon from June 30, 1971, the date the appeal was perfected. Costs are assessed to defendant appellant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hinds v. Poo-Yie's, Inc.
520 So. 2d 1016 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
Fontenot v. Cagle Chevrolet
448 So. 2d 904 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 So. 2d 514, 1971 La. App. LEXIS 5269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clifton-upholstery-co-v-kayjun-industries-inc-lactapp-1971.