Clifton Joe Campbell v. Frank H. Horton, Jr., Warden, State of South Carolina, County of Pickens

920 F.2d 926, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 21801, 1990 WL 205410
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 18, 1990
Docket90-6813
StatusUnpublished

This text of 920 F.2d 926 (Clifton Joe Campbell v. Frank H. Horton, Jr., Warden, State of South Carolina, County of Pickens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clifton Joe Campbell v. Frank H. Horton, Jr., Warden, State of South Carolina, County of Pickens, 920 F.2d 926, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 21801, 1990 WL 205410 (4th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

920 F.2d 926
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Clifton Joe CAMPBELL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Frank H. HORTON, Jr., Warden, State of South Carolina,
County of Pickens, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 90-6813.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 23, 1990.
Decided Dec. 18, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Karen L. Henderson, District Judge. (CA-86-2341)

Clifton Joe Campbell, appellant pro se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, S.C., for appellees.

D.S.C., [APPEAL AFTER REMAND FROM 888 F.2d 1385].

DISMISSED.

Before K.K. HALL, PHILLIPS and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Clifton Joe Campbell seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Campbell v. Horton, CA-86-2341 (D.S.C. March 26, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
920 F.2d 926, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 21801, 1990 WL 205410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clifton-joe-campbell-v-frank-h-horton-jr-warden-st-ca4-1990.