Clifton Heights Borough v. Thomas Kent Manufacturing Co.
212 Pa. 117
Opinion
We are of opinion that a preliminary injunction under the prayer of the supplemental bill should have been granted. The decree refusing it is reversed at the cost of the appellee, and the record is remitted with direction that an injunction be issued.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clifton Heights Borough v. Thomas Kent Manufacturing Co., 212 Pa. 117 (Pa. 1905).
212 Pa. 117 (Clifton Heights Borough v. Thomas Kent Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson v. Kent Manufacturing Co.
128 A. 501 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Clifton Heights Borough v. Thomas Kent Manufacturing Co.
69 A. 1114 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)