Clifton Ellis v. State of Texas
This text of Clifton Ellis v. State of Texas (Clifton Ellis v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant
v.
STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 1990-CR-1311
Honorable Samuel Katz, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Paul W. Green, Justice
Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Tom Rickhoff, Justice (1)
Paul W. Green, Justice
Delivered and Filed: January 9, 2002
AFFIRMED
Because the issues in this appeal involve the application of well-settled principles of law, we affirm the conviction in this memorandum opinion under Tex. R. App. P. 47.1 for the following reasons:
1. Considering the conflicting testimony presented at the revocation hearing, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding Ellis had assaulted his wife in violation of his probation terms. Jackson v. State, 915 S.W.2d 104, 106 (Tex.App. - San Antonio 1996, no pet.). We overrule Ellis's first issue.
2. Because Ellis failed to object at trial regarding the reliability of the drug testing equipment and results, he waived his second issue. Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(a); Nations v. State, 944 S.W.2d 795, 799 (Tex.App. -Austin 1997, pet. ref'd).
3. Holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion by considering evidence outside the record or in "assessing a punishment which is excessive in light of the specific facts," we overrule Ellis's third issue .
The judgment is affirmed.
PAUL W. GREEN,
JUSTICE
DO NOT PUBLISH
1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Clifton Ellis v. State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clifton-ellis-v-state-of-texas-texapp-2002.