Clifton E. Belcher v. Gary Dixon Joe L. Pratt T. L. McLaughlin

Fourth Circuit

Clifton E. Belcher v. Gary Dixon Joe L. Pratt T. L. McLaughlin

25 F.3d 1038, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20796, 1994 WL 251185

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 13, 1994

Docket93-7114

StatusPublished

This text of 25 F.3d 1038 (Clifton E. Belcher v. Gary Dixon Joe L. Pratt T. L. McLaughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clifton E. Belcher v. Gary Dixon Joe L. Pratt T. L. McLaughlin, 25 F.3d 1038, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20796, 1994 WL 251185 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

25 F.3d 1038
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Clifton E. BELCHER, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Gary DIXON; Joe L. PRATT; T. L. McLAUGHLIN, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7114.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 24, 1994.
Decided: June 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-119-CRT-F)

Clifton E. Belcher, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint without prejudice. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Belcher v. Dixon, No. CA-93-119-CRT-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 29 & Oct. 15, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

25 F.3d 1038
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Clifton E. BELCHER, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Gary DIXON; Joe L. PRATT; T. L. McLAUGHLIN, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7114.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 24, 1994.
Decided: June 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-119-CRT-F)

Clifton E. Belcher, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint without prejudice. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Belcher v. Dixon, No. CA-93-119-CRT-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 29 & Oct. 15, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 F.3d 1038, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20796, 1994 WL 251185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clifton-e-belcher-v-gary-dixon-joe-l-pratt-t-l-mcl-ca4-1994.