Clifton Construction v. Floyd

515 So. 2d 294, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2454, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10647
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 22, 1987
DocketNo. BR-462
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 515 So. 2d 294 (Clifton Construction v. Floyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clifton Construction v. Floyd, 515 So. 2d 294, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2454, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10647 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

BARFIELD, Judge.

The deputy’s order is AFFIRMED in all respects except as to the award of 12 hours per day of attendant care. The record will support but one conclusion, that the claimant needs 16 hours per day of such care. The order is therefore corrected to award 16 hours per day of attendant care since November 30, 1984 and continuing.

BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

STATE, DIV. OF WORKERS'COMPENSATION v. Hooks
515 So. 2d 294 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
515 So. 2d 294, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2454, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clifton-construction-v-floyd-fladistctapp-1987.